Transportation & Mining
Report
/

Letting People Move

Full Report Policy Table Policy Agenda for Congress Policy Agenda for State DOTs Policy Agenda for State Legislatures Technical Paper

Transportation policy represents a key tool to address both the cost of living and climate crises. In the United States, the shortcomings of today’s transportation system impact many facets of life, ranging from health care access to job retention to air quality. CCI’s original modeling and analysis of states’ funding decisions show that they are undermining their residents’ well-being and their own financial interests by choosing to overwhelmingly fund roads and highways rather than distributing funding to other modes. 

Intentional decisions have led to the current restrictive auto-centric US transportation system—but a deliberate policy agenda can lead to a new, more liberating system. Our new report outlines the imbalance in today’s transportation system, explains the impacts of this imbalance, and lays out concrete policy options for building a diversified transportation system that gives people more choice, reduces household expenses, and combats climate change.

The policy options that we propose fit into the following overarching strategies:
  1. Balance funding to support more freedom of transportation choices
  2. Connect climate goals and transportation planning
  3. Reorient project planning, design, and permitting to prioritize projects that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), improve safety, improve transit, and serve disadvantaged communities
  4. Level the playing field by realigning incentives for individuals to use socially beneficial transportation options
  5. Transform institutional structures, culture, and capacity to favor diversified transportation

Modeling the full cost of highways 

CCI modeling finds that every $1 billion shifted from highway widening to new urban rail transit is projected to reduce VMT by 1.8 million annually, save $1.7 billion in annual externalized social or environmental costs, and increase land values by $580 million. For context, Congress recently allocated $273 billion to the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) core formula funding programs, most of which will be spent locally and regionally by state Departments of Transportation (DOTs).

Every dollar of this budget represents a choice for state governments and local transportation planners: either stay stuck in an outdated, harmful, and unfair transportation system, or seize an opportunity to build the better system of the future.

Title: Annual benefits of shifting $1 billion from highway expansion to transit:
1,808,500,000 Reduced vehicle miles traveled
24 Lives saved
1,400 Injuries avoided
622,000 Tons of CO2 equivalent emissions eliminated
170 Tons of air pollutants (NOx, PM2.5, VOC) eliminated
$188,150,000 Savings in reduced traffic delays
$26,101,000 Reduced road maintenance costs
Title: Shifting highway funds to transit provides scalable social, economic, and environmental opportunities.
Text: There are many ways to shift funds away from highways and towards transit. For example, shifting $74 billion—just half of the budget that the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) allocates to the National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)—would result in:
134 billion fewer vehicle miles traveled
1,800 lives saved and 104,000 injuries prevented
46 million tons of CO2 and 12,300 tons of air pollutants prevented
$14 billion in savings from fewer traffic delays
$2 billion in road maintenance costs saved

How transportation funding flows from the US DOT to local communities and five barriers to mode shift

Through a research process including interviews, literature review and policy examination, we have identified barriers within government policies and institutions that stand in the way of policies that would support mode shift and VMT reduction. Poorly distributed funding represents the core barrier, while some of the other barriers contribute directly to the funding imbalance by tilting design or project selection toward projects that serve only cars.

Policy recommendations

In the accompanying policy table and federal, state legislative, and state DOT policy agendas we present policy levers for overcoming these barriers and facilitating mode shift and VMT reduction from different levels of government.

While state and local governments can enact many of these policy recommendations, Congress has the opportunity to spur some of the most influential changes in the upcoming 2026 surface transportation reauthorization. For example, Congress can dramatically reprioritize the formula funds allocated to each state, revise permitting processes to favor transit, and restructure existing highway and transit programs to balance the resources available to each. This report proposes creating a new agency structure to facilitate transportation projects that prioritize people and climate, which would include placing the Federal Transit Administration and a restructured FHWA under a new Federal Mobility Agency.

A diagram shows a proposed organizational structure for a new "Federal Mobility Agency (within the US DOT)" The FMA would create a new agency that oversees programs that help people move around, coordinating road, bike, pedestrian, and transit spending.

Included programs are:

Federal Highway Maintenance Program: FHWA becomes a renamed program within FMA, with focus on safety, repair maintenance and adaptation. Limited funding and guardrails on capacity expansion projects. Reduce field office staff or transition to support transit and active transportation.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

Federal Transit Administration

Bureau of Engineers and Planners would be a new bureau acting as a public consulting firm to help deliver transit and intercity projects more quickly and cheaply.

Field offices in every state to be established, potentially using existing FHWA field office infrastructure staffed at a level with personnel to help states move transit projects forward.

Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG), Carbon Reduction Program (CRP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), and PROTECT are grouped together with the goal to move some current FHWA programs out of the highway umbrella, orient toward transit and active transportation, and enact restrictions that limit capacity expansion projects and transportation.

Safe Streets for All and Thriving Communities, popular competitive grants, would become formula grant programs with increased funding to guarantee resources for every community.

Every additional $1 billion approved for highways pushes communities farther from economic prosperity and social welfare, locks in additional VMT and carbon emissions, and makes it harder for transit to reach its potential to bring down the cost of living for millions of households. This report is both an urgent call and a comprehensive playbook for shifting transportation funding from highways to transit and human-scale streets.

Full Report Policy Table Policy Agenda for Congress Policy Agenda for State DOTs Policy Agenda for State Legislatures Technical Paper

Meet the authors